Re: Non-decimal integer literals

On 2022-Jan-24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> +decinteger        {decdigit}(_?{decdigit})*
> +hexinteger        0[xX](_?{hexdigit})+
> +octinteger        0[oO](_?{octdigit})+
> +bininteger        0[bB](_?{bindigit})+

I think there should be test cases for literals that these seemingly
strange expressions reject, which are a number with trailing _ (0x123_),
and one with consecutive underscores __ (0x12__34).

I like the idea of these literals.  I would have found them useful on
many occassions.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/