Hi,
On 2021-09-03 12:55:23 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Oh, but of course we can't modify XLogReaderState in backbranches to add
> the new struct member abortedContrecordPtr (or whatever we end up naming
> that.)
Why is that? Afaict it's always allocated via XLogReaderAllocate(), so adding
a new field at the end should be fine?
That said, I'm worried that this stuff is too complicated to get right in the
backbranches. I suspect letting it stew in master for a while before
backpatching would be a good move.
Greetings,
Andres Freund