Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:24:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud  writes:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?
> 
> > Thanks, I find it way better!
> 
> OK, pushed that way, and with a couple other comment tweaks from
> an additional re-reading.

Thanks!  For the record I already pushed the required compatibility changes for
hypopg extension.