Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:03:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > + *    readOnlyTree: treat pstmt's node tree as read-only
> 
> > Maybe it's because I'm not a native english speaker, or because it's quite
> > late here, but I don't find "treat as read-only" really clear.  I don't have a
> > concise better wording to suggest.
> 
> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?

Thanks, I find it way better!