Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Дата
Msg-id 20210618151545.zamlaguxt4tudyjw@nol
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:03:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > + *    readOnlyTree: treat pstmt's node tree as read-only
> 
> > Maybe it's because I'm not a native english speaker, or because it's quite
> > late here, but I don't find "treat as read-only" really clear.  I don't have a
> > concise better wording to suggest.
> 
> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?

Thanks, I find it way better!



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add version macro to libpq-fe.h
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements