Re: Proposed patch for key managment
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20201221214434.GL28841@momjian.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch for key managment (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposed patch for key managment
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:38:55PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'll have a go at adding another keyring and/or abstracting the key
> > wrap and see how well a true peer to the passphrase approach fits in.
>
> Having patches to review and consider definitely helps, imv.
I disagree. Our order is:
Desirability -> Design -> Implement -> Test -> Review -> Commit
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Development_Process
so, by posting a patch, you are decided to skip the first _two_
requirements. I think it might be time for me to create a new thread
so it is not confused by whatever is posted here.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: