Hi Adam Brusselback,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:20:11 -0500
Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, just wanted to say I am very happy to see progress made on this,
> my codebase has multiple "materialized tables" which are maintained with
> statement triggers (transition tables) and custom functions. They are ugly
> and a pain to maintain, but they work because I have no other
> solution...for now at least.
We are want to find sutable use cases of the IVM patch being discussed in this
thread, and I remembered your post that said you used statement triggers and
custom functions. We hope the patch will help you.
The patch implements IVM of immediate, that is, eager approach. Materialized
views are updated immediately when its base tables are modified. While the view
is always up-to-date, there is a overhead on base table modification.
We would appreciate it if you could tell us what your use cases of materialized
view is and whether our implementation suits your needs or not.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>