On 2020-Sep-21, Tom Lane wrote:
> > ... isn't this more likely to create a typedef entry than merely a
> > function name?
>
> Well, yeah, it *is* a typedef. My proposal is to rename the C function
> to avoid the conflict, rather than renaming the typedef. Given the
> small number of direct calls (none), that's a lot less work. Also,
> I think pgtypes_numeric.h is exposed to ecpg client code, so changing
> that typedef's name could be quite problematic.
Ah, of course.
The idea of adding the names to pgindent's %blacklist results in severe
uglification, particularly in the regex code, so +1 for your workaround.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services