Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1023612.1600716072@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-21, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a proposed patch to fix it that way.
> pgtypes_numeric.h still contains
> typedef struct
> {
> } numeric;
> ... isn't this more likely to create a typedef entry than merely a
> function name?
Well, yeah, it *is* a typedef.  My proposal is to rename the C function
to avoid the conflict, rather than renaming the typedef.  Given the
small number of direct calls (none), that's a lot less work.  Also,
I think pgtypes_numeric.h is exposed to ecpg client code, so changing
that typedef's name could be quite problematic.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: