Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
От | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200723122909.2062a4d9@firost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 15:44:16 +0530 Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:05 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > <jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:29:00 +0530 > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > BTW, can you please test if the problem exist in back-branches, and does > > > your change fix it there as well? > > > > Gather Merge appears in v10, but I haven't been able to produce a plan > > using it. > > I am able to do it for v10. I think you can try by "set > enable_hashagg = off;" and following all other steps mentioned in your > email? Indeed. I confirm it produces the same result. I've been able to successfully test to proposed fix. > Attached, please find the patch for v10 with a modified commit > message. I will do it for other versions as well if you are fine with > it? I'm not an english-native writer, but I would rephrase this: We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems the better to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution. Thanks! Regards,
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: