Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match
Дата
Msg-id 20200627212610.GJ16644@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not match  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:48:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:29:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:11:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> I do think the doc could probably say replica 'or higher'.
> 
> +1.  Sounds good to me to just use "or higher" here.  The docs insist
> on the concept of hierarchy for values of wal_level.

Instead of mentioning a specific wal_level "or higher", I decided to
just mention the WAL level _not_ to use;  patch attached.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee


Вложения

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16513: Postgresql HA Cluster
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #16515: Core dump in libgdal30