Re: Bump default wal_level to logical

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Bump default wal_level to logical
Дата
Msg-id 20200608064555.GE2589@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bump default wal_level to logical  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Bump default wal_level to logical  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:59:14AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think we should first do performance testing to see what is the
> overhead of making this default.  I think pgbench read-write at
> various scale factors would be a good starting point.  Also, we should
> see how much additional WAL it generates as compared to current
> default.

+1.  I recall that changing wal_level to logical has been discussed in
the past and performance was the actual take to debate on.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bump default wal_level to logical
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup