Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix
Дата
Msg-id 20200525065735.GG387341@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 02:50:08PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em dom., 24 de mai. de 2020 às 14:34, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> escreveu:
>> It looks like they're only running pgbench for 60 second runs in all
>> configurations -- notice that "-T 60" is passed to pgbench. I'm not
>> entirely sure that that's all that there is to it. Still, there isn't
>> any real attempt to make it clear what's going on here. I have my
>> doubts about how representative these numbers are for that reason.
>
> I also find it very suspicious.

I don't know, but what seems pretty clear to me is this benchmark does
zero customization of postgresql.conf (it disables autovacuum!?), and
that the number of connections is calculated based on the number of
cores while the scaling factor is visibly calculated from the amount
of memory available in the environment.  Perhaps the first part is
wanted, but we are very conservative to allow PG to work on small-ish
machines with the default configuration, and a 56-core machine with
378GB of memory is not something I would define as small-ish.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL reader APIs and WAL segment open/close callbacks
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding