Re: Strange decreasing value of pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Strange decreasing value of pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()
Дата
Msg-id 20200509084807.GL11539@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Strange decreasing value of pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()  (godjan • <g0dj4n@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Strange decreasing value of pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()  (godjan • <g0dj4n@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:02:26PM +0500, godjan • wrote:
> Can you recommend what to use to determine which quorum standby
> should be promoted in such case?
> We planned to use pg_last_wal_receive_lsn() to determine which has
> fresh data but if it returns the beginning of the segment on both
> replicas we can’t determine which standby confirmed that write
> transaction to disk.

If you want to preserve transaction-level consistency across those
notes, what is your configuration for synchronous_standby_names and
synchronous_commit on the primary?  Cannot you rely on that?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore error message
Следующее
От: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stat() on Windows might cause error if target file is larger than 4GB