On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:47:29AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:56:36PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I don't think any such cleanup should hamper the patch at hand anyway.
>
> I don't think either, so I would do the split for the archive routines
> at least. It still feels strange to me to have a different routine
> name for the frontend-side of RestoreArchivedFile(). That's not
> really consistent with the current practice we have palloc() & co, as
> well as the sync routines.
Okay. Hearing nothing, I have rebased the patch set this morning,
improving some comments and the code format while on it. I would like
to commit both 0001 (creation of xlogarchiver.h) and 0002 attached in
the next couple of days. If you have an objection, please feel free.
--
Michael