On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:42:02AM +0000, Smith, Peter wrote:
> From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 28 October 2019 1:26 PM
>> It is missing the __cplusplus case?
>
> My use cases for the macro are only in C code, so that's all I was interested in at this time.
> If somebody else wants to extend the patch for C++ also (and test it) they can do.
It seems to me that there is a good point to be consistent with the
treatment of StaticAssertStmt and StaticAssertExpr in c.h, which have
fallback implementations in *all* the configurations supported.
@@ -858,7 +863,6 @@ extern void ExceptionalCondition(const char
*conditionName,
#endif
#endif /* C++ */
-
/*
A nit: noise diffs. (No need to send a new version just for that.)
--
Michael