Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds ormilliseconds?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds ormilliseconds?
Дата
Msg-id 20191106074110.GJ1604@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds ormilliseconds?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds ormilliseconds?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:21:38AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Ugh, the "if no unit specified" is true of all the settings.  Should we
> make that clearer in a more central location.

Hmm.  Are you thinking about a new single location in the docs?  I
would be afraid to have something like that rot easily as users would
most likely only read the description of each individual parameter
rather than travel across multiple sections.  Also, if you look at
guc.c the default units of each parameter are a case-by-case.
log_rotation_age uses minutes for example, autovacuum_naptime seconds,
etc.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?
Следующее
От: Eugen Konkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?