On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:03:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The idea of having CREATE COLLATION automatically create a comment
> is sort of interesting, although it seems pretty orthogonal to
> normal command behavior. I wonder whether the seeming need for
> this indicates that we should add a descriptive field to pg_collation
> proper, and not usurp the user-oriented comment feature for that.
>
> The difficulty with localization is that whatever we put into
> template1 has got to be ASCII-only, so that the template DB
> can be copied to other encodings. I suppose we could consider
> having CREATE COLLATION act differently during initdb than
> later, but that seems ugly too.
Or could it make sense to provide a system function which returns a
collation description for at least an ICU-provided one? We could make
use of that in psql for example.
--
Michael