Hi,
On 2019-09-05 14:16:11 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-09-04 16:49, fn ln wrote:
> > I made another patch for suggested behavior (COMMIT/ROLLBACK AND CHAIN
> > now gives us an error when used in an implicit block).
>
> I'm content with this patch.
Would need tests.
> Better disable questionable cases now and maybe re-enable them later
> if someone wants to make a case for it.
I do think the fact that COMMIT in multi-statement implicit transaction
has some usecase, is an argument for just implementing it properly...
Greetings,
Andres Freund