Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От fn ln
Тема Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions
Дата
Msg-id CA+99BHqxMfUyZcSh2B=ni5db83U1qtgX7bv+U7iXRbJqkTVFJg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Confirmed. Thank you all for your help.

The only concern is that this test:

   SET TRANSACTION READ WRITE\; COMMIT AND CHAIN;  -- error
   SHOW transaction_read_only;

   SET TRANSACTION READ WRITE\; ROLLBACK AND CHAIN;  -- error
   SHOW transaction_read_only;

makes more sense with READ ONLY because default_transaction_read_only is off at this point.

2019年9月9日(月) 5:27 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 2019-09-07 18:32, fn ln wrote:
>> Missed them somehow. But I don't think they're quite sufficient. I think
>> at least we also need tests that test things like multi-statement
>> exec_simple-query() *with* explicit transactions and chaining.
> Added a few more tests for that.

I committed this patch with some cosmetic changes and documentation updates.

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions