>>> On 2019-03-29 20:32, Joe Conway wrote:
>>>> pg_util <command> <options>
>>>
>>> How is that better than just renaming to pg_$oldname?
>>
>> As I already said in up thread:
>>
>>> This way, we would be free from the command name conflict problem
>
> Well, whatever we do -- if anything -- we would certainly need to keep
> the old names around for a while somehow. So this doesn't really make
> that issue go away.
Another complain was, it's hard to remember the tool names for novice
users. I think this way would solve the problem.
I agree that command name conflicting problem will not be solved by
the idea. However I do not believe there's name conflicting problem in
the first place. So I am happy to keep the old names as they are.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp