> One of our clients suggested that the installation document[1] lacks description
> about requriements of installing *-devel packages. For example, postgresqlxx-devel
> is required for using --with-pgsql, and openssl-devel for --with-openssl, and so on,
> but these are not documented.
>
> [1] http://www.pgpool.net/docs/pgpool-II-3.7.4/en/html/install-pgpool.html
>
> I know the document of PostgreSQL[2] also lacks the description about openssl-devel,
> kerberos-devel, etc. (except to readline-devl). However, it would be convenient
> for users who want to install Pgpool-II from source code if the required packages
> for installation are described in the document explicitly.
>
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-requirements.html
>
> Is it not worth to consider this?
I am against the idea.
Development package names could differ according to
distributions/OS. For example, the developement package of OpenSSL is
"openssl-dev", not "openssl-devel" in Debian or Debian derived
systems.
Another reason is, a user who is installaing software from source code
should be familiar enough with the fact that each software requires
development libraries.
In summary adding not-so-complete-list-of-development-package-names to
our document will give incorrect information to novice users, and will
be annoying for skilled users.
> BTW, the Pgpool-II doc[2] says:
>
> --with-memcached=path
> Pgpool-II binaries will use memcached for in memory query cache. You have to install libmemcached.
>
> , but maybe libmemcached-devel is correct instead of libmemcached?
I don't think so. "libmemcached-devel" is just a package name in a
cetain Linux distribution. "libmemcached" is a more geneal and non
distribution dependent term.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp