On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 04:00:42PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Thanks for looking at this. Your patch seems better, because it allows us
> to keep the error message consistent with the message one would get with
> list-partitioned syntax.
Thanks for confirming. I think that it would be nice as well to add
more test coverage for such error patterns with all the strategies.
It would be good to fix that first, so I can take care of that.
Now I don't really find the error "missing FROM-clause entry for
table" quite convincing when this is applied to a partition bound when
using a column defined in the relation. Adding more error classes in
the set of CRERR_NO_RTE would be perhaps nice, still I am not sure how
elegant it could be made when looking at expressions for partition
bounds.
--
Michael