Re: Reaping Temp tables to avoid XID wraparound

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 05:47:09PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We could I guess add a field specifically for temp_namespace_xid or such.
> The question is if it's worth the overhead to do that.

That would mean an extra 4 bytes in PGPROC, which is something we
could live with, still the use-case looks rather narrow to me to
justify that.

> Just having the namespace oid is at least enough to know that there is
> potentially something to go look at it. But it doesn't make for automated
> monitoring very well, at least not in systems that have a larger number of
> databases.

Yep.  It would be good to make sure about the larger picture before
doing something.
--
Michael