Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Дата
Msg-id 20190211200445.GA30250@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Feb-11, Tom Lane wrote:

> I've pushed this now.  I made one additional change, which was to fix
> things so that if both an INTERNAL and an EXTENSION dependency exist,
> the first loop will reliably complain about the EXTENSION dependency.
> It only takes one more if-test to do that now that we're postponing
> the error report till after the loop, and this way we don't need to
> split hairs about how likely it is for both to exist.
> 
> I think we're done with this thread, though I still need to look at
> the problem I complained of in <26527.1549572789@sss.pgh.pa.us>.

Thanks for taking care of this!

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Следующее
От: Gavin Flower
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance