Re: removal of dangling temp tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: removal of dangling temp tables
Дата
Msg-id 20181227225654.GA2196@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: removal of dangling temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: removal of dangling temp tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:30:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We allow structs to receive new members at the end of the struct, since
> this doesn't affect the offset of existing members; thus code already
> compiled with the previous struct definition does not break.  AFAICS
> there is no danger in backpatching that, moving that struct member at
> the end of the struct.

Sure.  Now this comes to PGPROC, which I am not sure we can say is
never manipulated as an array.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)