Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
Дата
Msg-id 20181219045328.GB19856@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:26:41PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 11/18/18 1:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 11/17/18 9:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> In the long run, I think we should add an option to processSQLNamePattern
>>> to use OR instead of AND, which would fix both this problem as well as
>>> pg_dump's.  I don't think that's important enough to stall this patch.

Agreed.  This patch is useful in itself.  This option would be nice to
have, and this routine interface would begin to grow too many boolean
switches to my taste so I'd rather use some flags instead.

The patch is doing its work, however I have spotted an issue in the
format of the dumps generated.  Each time an excluded database is
processed its set of SET queries (from _doSetFixedOutputState) as well
as the header "PostgreSQL database dump" gets generated.  I think that
this data should not show up.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use an enum for RELKIND_*?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE