Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
Дата
Msg-id 0cb923ce-b384-f0f6-5f90-7a3ebd42f660@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/18/18 11:53 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:26:41PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 11/18/18 1:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> On 11/17/18 9:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> In the long run, I think we should add an option to processSQLNamePattern
>>>> to use OR instead of AND, which would fix both this problem as well as
>>>> pg_dump's.  I don't think that's important enough to stall this patch.
> Agreed.  This patch is useful in itself.  This option would be nice to
> have, and this routine interface would begin to grow too many boolean
> switches to my taste so I'd rather use some flags instead.
>
> The patch is doing its work, however I have spotted an issue in the
> format of the dumps generated.  Each time an excluded database is
> processed its set of SET queries (from _doSetFixedOutputState) as well
> as the header "PostgreSQL database dump" gets generated.  I think that
> this data should not show up.


I'll take a look.


cheers


andrew


-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Bossart, Nathan"
Дата:
Сообщение: A few new options for vacuumdb
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insensitive collations