On 2018-11-26 15:09:43 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Nov-26, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > I would think we'd have the different GUCs and then the check functions
> > would only validate that they're valid inputs and then when we get to
> > the point where we're starting to do recovery we check and make sure
> > we've been given a sane overall configuration- which means that only
> > *one* is set, and it matches the recovery target requested.
>
> I don't quite understand why it isn't sensible to specify more than one
> and just stop recovery (or whatever) when at least one of them becomes
> true. Maybe I want to terminate just before commit of transaction
> 12345, but no later than 2018-11-11 12:47 in any case.
+1