On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 04:19:02PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think this is mostly fine, but it seems "if the instance just got
> out of recovery" doesn't fit well because it can happen anytime after
> recovery, this code gets called from checkpointer. I think we can
> slightly tweak it as below:
> "Perform this outside critical section so that the WAL insert
> initialization done by RecoveryInProgress() doesn't trigger an
> assertion failure."
>
> What do you say?
Fine for me.
>> Sure, feel free to if you have some room. I am fine to take care of it
>> as well, so that's up to you to decide.
>
> Okay, I will take care of it.
Thanks.
--
Michael