Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 <CAEepm=1xGTsLDx63UEdcJ8MdG63CNJ-tsDWHbH9djtvxRH5ZWw@mail.gmail.com>
> 2. We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a
> collation OID. I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for
> starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to
> rows in a non-shared catalog.
Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after
all.
Christoph