Re: Collation versioning

On 12/09/2018 10:15, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Thomas Munro 2018-09-07 <CAEepm=1xGTsLDx63UEdcJ8MdG63CNJ-tsDWHbH9djtvxRH5ZWw@mail.gmail.com>
>> 2.  We could remove datcollate and datctype and instead store a
>> collation OID.  I'm not sure what problems would come up, but for
>> starters it seems a bit weird to have a shared catalog pointing to
>> rows in a non-shared catalog.
> 
> Naive idea: make that catalog shared? Collations are system-wide after
> all.

By the same argument, extensions should be shared, but they are not.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services