Re: Built-in connection pooling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Built-in connection pooling
Дата
Msg-id 20180419205921.ydl6z7z7sy6ibvxv@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Built-in connection pooling  (Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-04-19 15:01:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Only after you can say "there's nothing wrong with this that isn't
> directly connected to its not being in-core" does it make sense to try
> to push the logic into core.

I think there's plenty things that don't really make sense solving
outside of postgres:
- additional added hop / context switches due to external pooler
- temporary tables
- prepared statements
- GUCs and other session state

I think there's at least one thing that we should attempt to make
easier for external pooler:
- proxy authorization

I think in an "ideal world" there's two kinds of poolers: Dumb ones
further out from the database (for short lived processes, keeping the
total number of connections sane, etc) and then more intelligent one
closer to the database.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Repeated crashes in GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY tests
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes