Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ioseph Kim
Тема Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
Дата
Msg-id 20180222174712.ab6l3eqwvrno6x34@postgresql.kr
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Translations contributions urgently needed  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi, I’m translating to Korean since 10 years over.
I think this issue should be left to the local community.
It may be omitted in some versions, or added in some versions.
because, it depends on volunteering.
Let It Be!

Regards Ioseph.


On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:29:11PM +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 22 February 2018 at 17:24, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have found that Japanese language support for the database server
> >> has been dropped for 10.  This is because it fell below the 80% of
> >> strings translated requirement, so it was shipped without Japanese.
> >> This isn't true of all components, but it seems quite alarming that
> >> we've pushed out PostgreSQL 10 with no language support for a country
> >> that has contributed a significant amount to the project, and has a
> >> relatively large number of users.
> >>
> >> The database server also dropped support for Indonesian and Portugese
> >> (Brazil).  In fact, just between 9.6 and 10, the following language
> >> support was dropped for these components:
> >>
> >>  cs       | plpython
> >>  de       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  es       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  fr       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  id       | postgres
> >>  it       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  ja       | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog,plpython,pltcl,postgres,psql
> >>  ko       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  pl       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  pt_BR    | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog,pltcl,postgres
> >>  ru       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  sv       | pg_resetxlog
> >>  tr       | plperl
> >>  zh_CN    | pg_basebackup,pg_resetxlog,pltcl
> >>  zh_TW    | plperl
> >
> >
> > Arent all those pg_resetxlog entries because it was renamed to pg_resetwal?
> > Is that because they were actually not updated for the new name, or is it a
> > reporting side effect?
> 
> Oh yes, okay, that's true.  I guess we can ignore those, so it's a
> little less dire for 9.6 to 10 then.  We get this instead, which is
> still not good:
> 
>  cs       | plpython
>  id       | postgres
>  it       | pg_resetxlog
>  ja       | pg_basebackup,plpython,pltcl,postgres,psql
>  pt_BR    | pg_basebackup,pltcl,postgres
>  tr       | plperl
>  zh_CN    | pg_basebackup,pltcl
>  zh_TW    | plperl
> 
> Thom
> 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Allow workers to override datallowconn