Re: operator exclusion constraints

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Ooh, that's kind of neat.  But I think you'd need EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY
> (=, =), since it could equally well be EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY (=, &&).

Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression.
EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though.  How
about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead?
        regards, tom lane