Re: operator exclusion constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: operator exclusion constraints
Дата
Msg-id 20174.1257432981@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Ooh, that's kind of neat.  But I think you'd need EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY
> (=, =), since it could equally well be EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY (=, &&).

Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression.
EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though.  How
about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Следующее
От: Rafael Martinez
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ident changes between 8.3 and 8.4