Re: operator exclusion constraints
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: operator exclusion constraints |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1257530051.27737.519.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: operator exclusion constraints (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: operator exclusion constraints
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression. > EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though. How > about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead? If I put EXCLUSION in the type_func_name keyword list, it works fine. But I'm having a little trouble trying to use EXCLUDING or EXCLUSIVE, because if I move them from unreserved to any other keyword list, I get reduce/reduce conflicts. Am I doing something wrong? I would assume that making words more reserved would usually not lead to conflicts. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: