[GENERAL]
| От | K. Brannen |
|---|---|
| Тема | [GENERAL] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20171103073537.3103AB8A@m0117568.ppops.net обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL]
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Rhhh Lin <ruanlinehan@hotmail.com> wrote: > *Also, as a sidenote - can someone please expand on why one (I was not involved in the creation of this DB/schema definition)would choose to have the definition of the timestamp column as a bigint in this case? Because the time value you need to hold exceeds 32 bits. :) Based on your example, you're storing epoch in milliseconds, which exceeds 2^32, so you have to use bigint. Check out thesize of the int and bigint data types in the docs. HTH, Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: