Re: [HACKERS] Pre-existing bug in trigger.c

Tom Lane wrote:

> After studying this awhile, I've concluded that neither of those
> ideas leads to a fix simple enough that I'd be comfortable with
> back-patching it.  What seems like the best answer is to not pass
> delete_ok = true to afterTriggerInvokeEvents in AfterTriggerEndQuery.
> Then, afterTriggerInvokeEvents will examine the passed event list
> pointer only during its loop initialization, at which time it's
> surely still valid.

For reference: this fix was committed as 27c6619e9c8f.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers