Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> > I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing
> > flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now
> > in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug
> > messages should be translated. So what about the attached?
>
> Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf
> is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed
> this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
Actually this code goes throgh vsnprintf, not fprintf, which should be
safe, so I removed that part of the comment, and pushed.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services