Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> Do you need a back-patchable version for 9.6? I could get one out of
> >> my pocket if necessary.
> >
> > I was just trying to find a bit of time to generate exactly that- if
> > you have a couple spare cycles, it would certainly help.
>
> OK, here you go. Even if archive_mode = always has been introduced in
> 9.5, but non-exclusive mode is a 9.6 feature, so here are patches down
> to this version. I am pretty satisfied by this, and I included all the
> comments and error message corrections reviewed up to now. I noticed
> some incorrect comments, doc typos and an incorrect indentation as
> well for the WARNING reported to the user when waiting for the
> archiving.
Thanks much for this. I've looked over it some and it looks pretty good
to me. I'm going to play with it a bit more and, barring issues, will
push them tomorrow morning.
Thanks!
Stephen