On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:15:58PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 01:06:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I actually think "regular" might be a better choice than "normal" for this
> > purpose, mainly because somebody looking for statistical aggregates might
> > think that "normal" has something to do with normal distributions. So
> > maybe we should leave that one group of uses alone and s/normal/regular/
> > in section 9.20. But in any case it would help to define the term
> > explicitly in both sections.
>
> I don't think adding another defined term in this dense text is going to
> help so I just specified "general-purpose and statistical aggregates"
> where needed; patch attached.
>
> I didn't touch any mention of "normal" in reference to
> pg_aggregate.aggfnoid where normal/"n" has a specific meaning.
Patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +