Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64
Дата
Msg-id 20170223225537.GP20486@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output output of base64  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:08:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Is there a reason we don't support base64 as a bytea_output output
> > option, except that no one has implemented it?
> 
> How about "we already have one too many bytea output formats"?
> I don't think forcing code to try to support still another one
> is a great thing ... especially not if it couldn't be reliably
> distinguished from the hex format.

Is there a reason we chose hex over base64?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins
Следующее
От: Venkata B Nagothi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Range Partitioning behaviour - query