Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size

On 2017-02-15 22:46:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now that we've renamed "xlog" to "wal" in user-facing elements, I think
> we should strive to use the name "wal" internally too in new code, not
> "xlog" anymore.  This patch introduces several variables, macros,
> functions that ought to change names now -- XLogSegmentOffset should be
> WALSegmentOffset for example.  (I expect that as we touch code over
> time, the use of "xlog" will decrease, though not fully disappear).

I think this will just decrease the consistency in xlog.c (note the
name) et al.