Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs. pg_ctl stop -m fast

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs. pg_ctl stop -m fast
Дата
Msg-id 20170113024316.GA28325@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs. pg_ctl stop -m fast  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:17:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > In 9.5, the default pg_ctl stop mode was changed from "smart" to "fast".
> > In pg_upgrade, there is this code:
> >     ...
> > I think the last line should be changed to something like
> >               fast ? "-m fast" : "-m smart");
> 
> Ugh.  Clear oversight.
> 
> There is maybe room for a separate discussion about whether pg_upgrade
> *should* be using fast mode, but if so we could remove the "bool fast"
> argument from this function altogether.

Agreed, it should be remove.  Should I do it?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes