Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Even if we decide to keep the message, I think it's not very good
> > wording anyhow; as a translator I disliked it on sight.  Instead of
> > "skipping scan to validate" I would use "skipping validation scan",
> > except that it's not clear what it is we're validating.  Mentioning
> > partition constraint in errcontext() doesn't like a great solution, but
> > I can't think of anything better.
> 
> Maybe something like: partition constraint for table \"%s\" is implied
> by existing constraints

Actually, shouldn't we emit a message if we *don't* skip the check?


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services