Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Дата
Msg-id 20161207.141341.354688247472486759.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
> Potential risks involving minor upgrades are far higher than the risks
> involved by systemd, so -1 for a backpatch seen from here.

As long as we would have a compile time switch to enable/disable the
back-patched feature, it seems it would be acceptable. In the worst
case, the back-patching could bring disasters, but in that case
packagers could turn off the switch and ship updated version of
packages.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Следующее
От: Andreas Seltenreich
Дата:
Сообщение: Short reads in hash indexes (was: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in _hash_splitbucket_guts)