Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Дата
Msg-id 20161124193611.42imqbihlack7vmh@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2016/11/24 15:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Amit Langote wrote:

> >> You have to specify column constraints using the keywords WITH OPTIONS,
> >> like below:
> >>
> >> create table p1 partition of p (
> >>     a with options primary key
> >> ) for values in (1);
> > 
> > Oh, sorry for not noticing it. You are right. Why do we need "with
> > option" there? Shouldn't user be able to specify just "a primary key";
> > it's not really an "option", it's a constraint.
> 
> I just adopted the existing syntax for specifying column/table constraints
> of a table created with CREATE TABLE OF type_name.

I think CREATE TABLE OF is pretty much a corner case.  I agree that
allowing the constraint right after the constraint name is more
intuitive.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.6 TAP tests and extensions
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump / copy bugs with "big lines" ?