On 2016-10-18 13:38:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have implemented this idea and it works for MVCC scans. However, I
> >> think this might not work for non-MVCC scans. Consider a case where
> >> in Process-1, hash scan has returned one row and before it could check
> >> it's validity in heap, vacuum marks that tuple as dead and removed the
> >> entry from heap and some new tuple has been placed at that offset in
> >> heap.
>
> > Oops, that's bad.
>
> Do we care? Under what circumstances would a hash index be used for a
> non-MVCC scan?
Uniqueness checks, are the most important one that comes to mind.
Andres