Hello,
At Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:00:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in
<20160913130032.GA391646@alvherre.pgsql>
> Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > If we take a policy to try to imitate the behavior of some
> > > reference platform (specifically Linux) on other platforms, this
> > > is required disguising. Another potential policy on this problem
> > > is "following the platform's behavior". From this viewpoint, this
> > > message should be shown to users because Windows says
> > > so. Especially for socket operations, the simultion layer is
> > > intending the former for non-error behaviors, but I'm not sure
> > > about the behaviors on errors.
> >
> > The more you hack windows, the more you'll notice that it is full of
> > caveats, behavior exceptions, and that it runs in its way as nothing
> > else in this world... This patch looks like a tempest in a teapot at
> > the end. Why is it actually a problem to show this message? Just
> > useless noise? If that's the only reason let's drop the patch and move
> > on.
>
> Yeah, I looked into this a few days ago and that was my conclusion also:
> let's drop this.
Ok, I greed. Thanks.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center