> Tatsuo>understanding it always uses unnamed portal even if the SQL is like
> "BEGIN" or "COMMIT" (no parameters). They are too often used. Why not
> doing like this?
>
> Does it actually work?
>
> The documentation says named portals last till the end of the transaction:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/protocol-flow.html#PROTOCOL-FLOW-EXT-QUERY
>
>
> doc>If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of
> the current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed
Oh, ok. I misunderstood that named portals survive beyond transaction
boundary.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp