Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> В письме от 25 мая 2016 13:25:38 Вы написали:
> > Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > > >This all should me moved behind "access method" abstraction...
> > >
> > > +1 relopt_kind should be moved in am, at least. Or removed.
> >
> > Hm, but we have tablespace options too, so I'm not sure that using AM as
> > abstraction level is correct.
> We will use am for all indexes, and keep all the rest in relopotion.c for
> non-indexes. May be divided options catalog into sections one section for each
> kind.
That makes sense. I can review the patch later.
> And as I also would like to use this code for dynamic attoptions later, I
> would like to remove relopt_kind at all. Because it spoils live in that case.
As I remember, Fabrízio (in CC) had a patch for dynamic reloptions, but
there was some problem with it and we dumped it; see
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFcNs+rqCq1H5eXW-cvdti6T-xo2STEkhjREx=OdmAkK5tiOOw@mail.gmail.com
for previous discussion.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services